Is it just a poor leadership response that led to the severity of this crisis or is the underlying economic system and a for -profit health system contributing factors?
Disclaimer: I fully admit that I
am not an expert in the fields of healthcare or economic systems. I also have
to say that this has been one of the most difficult articles I’ve tried to
write in my 25+ years of doing this. It
is easy to point fingers but it may take articles like this to lay the
groundwork for the necessary changes we must face as a nation in the coming months
and years. I do feel, after listening to
weeks of depressing news on the extent of spread of the COVID-19 virus throughout
the world, that a discussion of this type has merit. It probably is best to allow the focus at
this time to be on limiting the devastation, both to our health and our
economy, but at some point when the dust is cleared, there will be a need for scrutiny
beyond compare as to what went wrong and what we can do to be better prepared
next time, for there will be a next time.
I can’t get this nagging question
out of my mind: “Would we as a nation have been better able to respond to this
crisis if we had implemented a government-managed, single-payer health system
during the Obama administration?” There
is evidence that indicates that much of what we have faced in the lack of
supplies and equipment (beds, ventilators, etc.) was caused by a for-profit
health system that is designed to provide for only those needs that are
typical, frequent and profitable to process. In this article published by The
Guardian entitled: "Coronavirus
is revealing how broken America’s economy really is" it demonstrates
in very clear terms how severely restricted the US health system is in its ability
to respond to a pandemic of any kind.
Category after category of statistical data shows that we have one of
the worst healthcare systems in the world, from the number of hospital beds and
doctors per capita to maternal deaths, life expectancy, and income inequality. In nearly every case, the U.S. is ranked in
third-world like territory. In addition,
the cost in healthcare in 2018 in the U.S. was the most expensive in the world,
representing 17.15% of our GDP ($3.6 trillion - source www.CMS.gov). Switzerland is second at 12.25%
We have the most
expensive healthcare system in the world and are the least capable of handling a
crisis.
“The facts are as exhaustive as they are exhausting. There’s one simple
conclusion from all of this. We’ve been tricked. We’ve been told that America,
like most other majority-white countries, deserves the title “developed
economy”. It does not... You cannot constantly operate hospitals at close to
capacity in order to maximize profits. The pursuit of private money in systems
built for public good has not worked ethically or practically.” (The Guardian)
A simple comparison of this
healthcare model to the restaurant and hospitality industries will show you
that empty hotel beds and empty tables at a restaurant are not a good thing for
profits. Everything possible is done in
those industries to minimize these “empty” factors. The same is true in a healthcare-for-profit
industry. A for-profit hospital cannot
not maintain a large inventory of extra, unused equipment and supplies on hand and
maintain profitability at the same time.
Maintaining a full capacity with a just-in-time supply chain leaves us a
system that will never be able to respond to a national epidemic suchmas the one we are now experiencing
The main criticisms have been the manner in which we responded to this pandemic and that we did not have sufficient virus testing supplies, Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), ICU beds and ventilators available. The one consistent comment was: “The supply chain is broken.” It is a supply chain designed to handle the day-to-day with regularly scheduled, weekly deliveries of supplies that are relatively consistent from week to week. In addition to not having supplies for this large of a surge of critical patients, there is no central authority managing the orders, prioritizing and guaranteeing prioritization and delivery to where the need was the highest. Instead, everyone was competing for the same supplies. John Doe ordering on Amazon was just as able to order the critically needed PPE equipment as was in demand at an ER in New York City. States were unsuccessfully trying to outbid each other and the Federal government along with every other countries in the world for these supplies. The only thing this achieved was to drive the prices through the roof so those who held them would profit immensely by having them.
The main criticisms have been the manner in which we responded to this pandemic and that we did not have sufficient virus testing supplies, Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), ICU beds and ventilators available. The one consistent comment was: “The supply chain is broken.” It is a supply chain designed to handle the day-to-day with regularly scheduled, weekly deliveries of supplies that are relatively consistent from week to week. In addition to not having supplies for this large of a surge of critical patients, there is no central authority managing the orders, prioritizing and guaranteeing prioritization and delivery to where the need was the highest. Instead, everyone was competing for the same supplies. John Doe ordering on Amazon was just as able to order the critically needed PPE equipment as was in demand at an ER in New York City. States were unsuccessfully trying to outbid each other and the Federal government along with every other countries in the world for these supplies. The only thing this achieved was to drive the prices through the roof so those who held them would profit immensely by having them.
In the meantime,
patients and healthcare workers died.
Daily the Federal Government was
asked to provide support to the growing crisis.
Regular messages from Trump and the White House said things such as: “We are not to blame.” “Relax, it’s going to disappear.” “The
Federal Government is not designed to be an ordering system.” “We won’t need 40,000 or 30,000 ventilators.” “This is our inventory; it’s not for the
States.”
There was failure in leadership
at the State level as well, indicated by the simple fact that at this writing,
more than a month into the crisis there are governors who have yet to order Stay-at-Home
requirements. Everyone in the world
knows by now that the only way to fight this disease is to keep people isolated
from one another. Countries such as
Germany, South Korea and New
Zealand are shining examples how separation procedures work.
Failure in leadership
cost thousands of lives. When a disaster
strikes, people are completely reliant on the leadership of their community to
make the right decisions to mitigate and eliminate unnecessary loss of life.
How does our economic system play
a role? Are the failures in the
healthcare system and in leadership the root cause or is there something else
at play?
A discussion about the impact of
neoliberalism on our ability to respond to a pandemic of this magnitude can
take us into an economic debate that is over one hundred years in the
making. Suffice it to say that there is
strong evidence that the economy of Milton Friedman which is focused on
generating wealth for the elite and depends on market mechanisms to respond to
all societies’’ needs under a for-profit focus is clearly another contributing
factor to the escalated crisis. So much
so that it can be referred to as The
Plague of Liberlism, published by Truthout.org. After reading this interview, I was inspired
to write the following words:
“Economists have understood the failure of neoliberalism to afford
succor to anyone but the ultra-elite ever since the Robber baron era. As Ayn Rand's books grew in popularity
in the 1960’s I remember having long discussions with my mother, who was a fan.
I kept saying it was an elitist philosophy that would leave us (the middle
class) out in the cold. Now we see the full impact of the failure of
neoliberalism in its inability to respond to worldwide disasters like Climate
Change and COVID-19. Perhaps a pertinent question today would be "Who is
John Galt and who the hell does he think he is?"
Who is John Galt and can he save us from the plagues of COVID-19, a third-world
healthcare system, failed leadership, and from economic neoliberalism? Can
God?
I doubt it.

No comments:
Post a Comment